Passa al testo della news

Lunedì 10 Novembre 2003

Sfida a 250GB/7200 rpm

Inviata alle 09:56 da Michele Mattiolo | Per questa news ci sono Commenti 1 commenti | Permalink Permalink
Su X-bit labs è stato pubblicato un articolo che illustra ed analizza la performance di alcuni dischi di ultima generazione nel taglio più capiente disponibile ad oggi, 250 GB. Questi dischi sono tutti a 7200 rpm e differiscono solo per l'interfaccia SATA e PATA.

Dopo i numerosi test eseguiti, ne esce che l'interfaccia SATA non è ancora indice di superiore velocità e prestazioni come molti già credono.

Queste le conclusioni dell'autore:
I would also like to say that SerialATA interface is still no guarantee of the hard disk drive fastness. Probably the type of workload during our test session doesn’t allow us to feel the advantages of the SATA interface. Moreover, all contemporary HDDs except for Seagate drives SerialATA support is implemented via the PATA-SATA bridge, so you shouldn’t even hope for something remarkable then. The only thing that we can hope to get from the SATA support implemented in HDDs of large storage capacity is simpler integration of the drives into DataBase servers.

Of course, the indisputable star of our today’s test session appeared Hitachi hard disk drive: excellent seek time and interesting algorithms implementation helped this solution to win in many benchmarks. I would like to specifically stress its extremely high performance in server patterns.

Maxtor drive, on the contrary, didn’t show anything extraordinary in server patterns, but coped perfectly well with streaming reading and writing requests. Which we have just seen in read, write and file copy tests. This way, Maxtor solution would become a good choice for a multimedia PC, which often has to process a lot of large files. Also if you are about to assemble a video server, I suggest that you consider getting this HDD for such a system.

Western Digital hard disk drives proved pretty fast in server patterns, but their actual trump is the desktop field. So keep that in mind when shopping.


L'articolo è consultabile a questo indirizzo.



News precedente News successiva
Microsoft presenta il nuovo Office 2003 Microsoft Office Pro 2003 a €10

 

 

Se vuoi, puoi commentare questa news anche dal nostro forum,
accedendo a questa discussione.

Commento #1 di
Hw-Vault
10 novembre 2003 alle 09:56
Sfida a 250GB/7200 rpm
Su X-bit labs ? stato pubblicato un articolo che illustra ed analizza la performance di alcuni dischi di ultima generazione nel taglio pi? capiente disponibile ad oggi, 250 GB. Questi dischi sono tutti a 7200 rpm e differiscono solo per l'interfaccia SATA e PATA.

Dopo i numerosi test eseguiti, ne esce che l'interfaccia SATA non ? ancora indice di superiore velocit? e prestazioni come molti gi? credono.

Queste le conclusioni dell'autore:
I would also like to say that SerialATA interface is still no guarantee of the hard disk drive fastness. Probably the type of workload during our test session doesn?t allow us to feel the advantages of the SATA interface. Moreover, all contemporary HDDs except for Seagate drives SerialATA support is implemented via the PATA-SATA bridge, so you shouldn?t even hope for something remarkable then. The only thing that we can hope to get from the SATA support implemented in HDDs of large storage capacity is simpler integration of the drives into DataBase servers.

Of course, the indisputable star of our today?s test session appeared Hitachi hard disk drive: excellent seek time and interesting algorithms implementation helped this solution to win in many benchmarks. I would like to specifically stress its extremely high performance in server patterns.

Maxtor drive, on the contrary, didn?t show anything extraordinary in server patterns, but coped perfectly well with streaming reading and writing requests. Which we have just seen in read, write and file copy tests. This way, Maxtor solution would become a good choice for a multimedia PC, which often has to process a lot of large files. Also if you are about to assemble a video server, I suggest that you consider getting this HDD for such a system.

Western Digital hard disk drives proved pretty fast in server patterns, but their actual trump is the desktop field. So keep that in mind when shopping.


L'articolo ? consultabile a questo indirizzo.

Link alla notizia: http://www.hw-vault.com/news.php?id=1315
Commento #2 di
lynux
10 novembre 2003 alle 12:00
e semplicemente vero cmq per un utente di medie dimensioni un HD da 80 Gb va benissimo a meno che non sia uno di quei downloader pesanti !smile.gif bun lavoro ragazzi

Aggiungi un commento

Per inviare il tuo commento, hai bisogno di loggarti!

Login





 

Ultime news



Cerca quello che vuoi in questo sito o nel web!




Ricerca Powered by Google